nihilism is rejection of all religious and moral principles, in the belief that life is meaningless.
This is an interesting point of view that seems to be projected whenever I catch someone with their pants down, so to speak and it is worth writing books about, I would say. Materialism makes me feel frustrated and angry as society becomes elitist, cosmopolitan and attempts to interpret facts unilaterally about the other, which is a philosophy that does not incorporate my own goals and ideals. The consistently boring and nauseate silent conspiracy from underperforming administrators is limited only by their own self-interests, therefore this in itself is a conflict.
I have olfactory, sensory, and, fear-based psychology that somehow seems to make me feel tired and disgusted and very irritable and angry, I also come across as having a very argumentative and confrontational personality this can create negative impressions in the mind of the other, as our local culture is made of people who are intolerant to human beings unfortunately, as our culture is becoming cosmopolitan and has moved away from humanitarian stance except in public relations where there is clear advantage in posing with political figures to get better branding through philanthropy. We thank them just the same, notwithstanding the commercial interest in such low-stooping philanthropy that still leaves some wondering about the real ethics, particularly if they are philosophers or people who do not believe evidence. Someone argued Satanists tend to be stubborn, is this debatable?
I had a very clear career escalation plan, however, I got a few variables wrong in forecasting, and, I made errors in strategic, technical and managerial decision making, not to mention other damages, reputational, moral and at times legal. Now I feel as though I am to be labelled a loser, but this is merely how I feel, it is possible that others are not interested in understanding my morality or conscious they are more interested in how I can contribute to their own goals, if I were to take a collectivist summary of their presumed goal-oriented psychology taken as a result of years of careful observation of how others question my curriculum vitae.
I had other plans, they were subject to cruel and discriminatory cold water tests by individuals who competed with me and defrauded me out of my own ability to manage, I felt this was unfair form of career hijacking, to the expense of my own potential.
On one hand, nihilism keeps us from implementing new ideas as there is a socially inspired consensus that in the absence of a perfectionist win-win situation, deterministic assumptions may have weaknesses and may fall short from throwing ideas that are constructive in their outset. Authority based on majority is the evidence of the authoritative thinking, that is counter-balanced with democratic philosophy hopefully promoted with a pacifist point of view and assuming politicians have established a baseline considered essential for survival and well-being, a goal that leaves some questions pending.
Between 0.5 and 5.9% of people in the United Stated have borderline personality disorder (BPD) at least once in their lives. The 5.9% is an outlier and a likely explanation could be the fact that a newly developed, not validated questionnaire had been used. Average prevalence worldwide: between 0.5% and 1.7%. Perfect correlations are achieved when the system is closed to participation therefore is not being allowed to influence itself by the demand and supply mechanics of the democracy and its needs, this may be a leading factor causing disorders of different categories, as has been shown through experience and research.
The lack of emotional intelligence, is thought to be a very difficult psychosis to comprehend, since our brain normally processes emotions, except in cases where damage occurs.
On the other hand nihilism gives a false negative sense of confidence to pragmatists who feel that negativity is true simply because it has happened in the past, as this is evidence that we are regrettably in over-reliance of patterns we learnt in the past and we are unable to learn new patterns, therefore it is asked to reform the systems, not to re-surface them, with due respect. Some thieves are more confident exhibiting nihilism with assets that they do not own themselves whereby they have registered a pledge, whilst others have registered no pledge but earmarked an interest in concluding a project or an affair, with our without a scope, a start date, an end date and a work-plan, as it leads to implementation and delivery, and, it is normative workplace psychology to move on instead of revising retrospective issues, for reasons that have a false bias as they seem to relate to matters said to be related to force majeure whereas they could actually have been designed in a different manner, presumably. Nonetheless religious freedom (where it does not prejudice without reason) is a fundamental right.
For example, it was suggested, that, to improve financial models, new services have to be made available that were simple, conceptual and easy to comprehend and administer by all parties of a contract, without losing the notion of monetary value on both sides, naturally and with a long-term view to support financial needs.
I realised that the higher up the career ladder the more difficult they seemed in purporting and speculating whether others have equivalent knowledge, resources and assets that were precious to them as they were to the landlord and this lead to an interesting analysis of what services one can derive through advanced financial formulae, in a globalist and competitive market.
Researching I found that the average size of the brain is 3 pounds and has a diameter of about six inches (less than 2 kilograms), naturally this is the size of the adult brain in a particular nation where we are excluding humans who are of a record physical size as I learnt from a book that I may purchase from bookstores and other publishers and agents.
Researching further it transpires that many office workers are influenced by the structure of an essay, they do not read code very thoroughly and miss out on important details that they realise later were important, and, this leads to the old fashioned doctrine of asking people to be earnest, in a way this is a hypocrite statement.
What would I do differently than that which we already have?
There are plenty of books on the bookshelf, some of my preferred bookshelves are online and include theoretical books on psychology, the human brain, biology, and, natural sciences.
I published other relevant stories online as well, and, perhaps the issue of not allowing me to hyperlink keeps me hidden away from web crawling spiders and search engines.