History refers to the study of historic events, whereas we were taught that actions can be explained in the timeline of how they occurred, how they are being experienced right now, and, what the future will hold.
We are not sure how being minimalistic relates to greater benefits, what can be ascertained is that economic theory does not predict only regulations, and to think that we are being dominated by media-relations that indoctrinate us to feeling addicted to the television box makes me feel as though I am a de-humanized embryo, with restricted liberty possibly due to our own actions such as road rage. theories related to our own psychology define our obstacles to success which are controlled by structures, some of which can be corrupted it transpires as some managers decided to create a whole profession out of their own fears, and, start charging money for it being the source of many sources that dis-level equilibria in other systems, as a way to take opportunist advantage of another, and, this compels us to create integrated, closed or disparate systems, as long as we considered tangled systems to be disparate, as even this is a false ideology, essentially in networking theory.
Psychologists made me feel as though forgetting the past was a better way forward but my soul was not cleansed from my anger, and, this is thought to be an inherited form of anger, that others project in a manner that seems harassing, or project as harassing conventionally to hide their own discriminatory practices, a matter that is unfair to some or many and that is in conflict with ethics in any case. I remember my childhood, schooling and the way I was graded and measured, I almost felt as though I was the laughing stock of educators who paid lower-than-medium wages did what they can to cope with a classroom full of naughty students, whilst my parents paid hefty fees for their services, when asked for value added in consumer forums, all post-graduate management professionals seemed to look the other way, and, I thought, what an interesting bunch of fellows.
It is strongly felt that the segregation of professions has given rise to a structure that few will agree to reform, merely because it is in their self-interest to preserve. Some persons living in certain high class areas appear to still maintain a high life style, whilst leaving others drowning, this is the evidence of the equality problem in my view of things where restricting liberties is not serving to control but to create more frustration amongst those who still have unresolved problems that they were put into by the very organisation of society and its systematic contradictions.
I have changed over the years, physically and even my outlook to life changed, it has been shaped by a lot of weather conditions and other influences. The oligopolistic pre-destination mechanism fails to achieve its objectives because other influences are not being controlled equally therefore in a utopia there would be an uneven level playing field, again, communism is at times a necessary form of business de-attractor that may inspire it depends how you look at the matter, I am presuming and this means the politician does not have a real job, s/he is just a rubber stamp.
It is dissociative to publicly claim what is right and privately justify that which breaches other ethics, particularly as you might be aware nobody controls your thoughts and you are able to frame-up arguments in any way you choose to influence, but still this can make you feel guilty, prejudiced and on the track of mind that actually society wants you to think, rather than your liberal self-interested ego which clarifies what your instinct really wants from life.
I have asked therefore what is your preferred obsession?
We tend to think that politicians make us believe that doing good has a positive outcome, however, we have clearly seen that this only leads to self-centred results, not to benefits for those who cannot afford to follow, and, this is a contentious ethical argument in socio-political speeches, where our contribution is felt but not very much measured except in structures that float high above, too high above you for you to reach individually.
Therefore, the promise of progressive productivity is really asking you to consume, and, clearly if we only wanted to encourage expenditure, without taking care of other factors contributing to happiness, then we will sense that there is a null hypothesis where the goals you project and the goals I project are never on the common path, as you seem quite territorial to myself in your speeches, does this reflect the impact of your proposals, or are we not allowed to know what you are cooking when we are not looking?
This hide and seek game called life is complicated, there are different versions of it amongst policymakers who believe that they can assume they know you better than you know yourself, clearly this may imply arrogance, and this is an undesirable trait in leadership. The way life is portrayed in published books does not vary much from how we feel whether this is mathematical, a law of physics or merely written out in a language we understand, however, the differential between life and the future is the change that we do not manage to project, this is the real measure of performance in politics.
I am not certain how the past influenced the present, and, what the present judge will think, he might be mistaken for all I care, however, I do care about foreseeing a future, and, so far, I am flooded with thoughts that seem to project me below ground rather than above the ground.
The discrepancy lies in services, I deduce.